<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>JusticeInfo.net</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/en</provider_url><title>NAHIMANA'S LAWYERS APPEAL COURT'S DECISION TO BAR EXPERT WITNESS</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="LCiVjAWlE0"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/17418-en-en-nahimanas-lawyers-appeal-courts-decision-to-bar-expert-witness81848184.html"&gt;NAHIMANA'S LAWYERS APPEAL COURT'S DECISION TO BAR EXPERT WITNESS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/17418-en-en-nahimanas-lawyers-appeal-courts-decision-to-bar-expert-witness81848184.html/embed#?secret=LCiVjAWlE0" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;NAHIMANA'S LAWYERS APPEAL COURT'S DECISION TO BAR EXPERT WITNESS&#x201D; &#x2014; JusticeInfo.net" data-secret="LCiVjAWlE0" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Arusha, March 5, 2003 (FH) - The defence team of Ferdinand Nahimana, one of the three media personalities accused of genocide in the socalled Media Trial, appealed on Tuesday to Trial Chamber One of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to go back on its decision of not allowing an expert witness. JeanMarie BijuDuval from [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/wp-content/uploads/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>630</thumbnail_height></oembed>
