<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>JusticeInfo.net</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/en</provider_url><title>24.08.07 - ICTR/TRANSFER - THE TRANSFER POLICY OF THE ICTR PROSECUTOR TAKES ANOTHER HIT</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Mgg0W88gYq"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/19022-en-en-240807-ictrtransfer-the-transfer-policy-of-the-ictr-prosecutor-takes-another-hit97899789.html"&gt;24.08.07 - ICTR/TRANSFER - THE TRANSFER POLICY OF THE ICTR PROSECUTOR TAKES ANOTHER HIT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/19022-en-en-240807-ictrtransfer-the-transfer-policy-of-the-ictr-prosecutor-takes-another-hit97899789.html/embed#?secret=Mgg0W88gYq" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;24.08.07 - ICTR/TRANSFER - THE TRANSFER POLICY OF THE ICTR PROSECUTOR TAKES ANOTHER HIT&#x201D; &#x2014; JusticeInfo.net" data-secret="Mgg0W88gYq" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>The Hague, 24 August 2007 (FH) - After the decision of a Dutch court that ruled that it did not have the jurisdiction to try suspects of the Rwandan genocide and the release in France of two accused, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is facing a true puzzle if it wants to finish [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/wp-content/uploads/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>630</thumbnail_height></oembed>
