<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>JusticeInfo.net</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/en</provider_url><title>07.12.07 - ICTR/MEDIAS - THE APPEAL CHAMBER SHOWS THE DEFICIENCIES AND THE WEAKNESSES OF THE FIRST J</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="BCFtJYYQGj"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/19547-en-en-071207-ictrmedias-the-appeal-chamber-shows-the-deficiencies-and-the-weaknesses-of-the-first-j1033010330.html"&gt;07.12.07 - ICTR/MEDIAS - THE APPEAL CHAMBER SHOWS THE DEFICIENCIES AND THE WEAKNESSES OF THE FIRST J&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/19547-en-en-071207-ictrmedias-the-appeal-chamber-shows-the-deficiencies-and-the-weaknesses-of-the-first-j1033010330.html/embed#?secret=BCFtJYYQGj" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;07.12.07 - ICTR/MEDIAS - THE APPEAL CHAMBER SHOWS THE DEFICIENCIES AND THE WEAKNESSES OF THE FIRST J&#x201D; &#x2014; JusticeInfo.net" data-secret="BCFtJYYQGj" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>The Hague, 7 December (FH) - The appeal chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), in rendering last week its judgment in the "media" case, did not follow the position taken by the first instance chamber on 3 December 2003.</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/wp-content/uploads/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>630</thumbnail_height></oembed>
