<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>JusticeInfo.net</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/en</provider_url><title>19.12.08 - ICTR/MILITARY I - ANALYSIS: &#x2018;MILITARY I' VERDICT IS A FUNDAMENTAL JUDGEMENT AT ICTR</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="xtWb1dYzRn"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/20911-en-en-191208-ictrmilitary-i-analysis-military-i-verdict-is-a-fundamental-judgement-at-ictr1171811718.html"&gt;19.12.08 - ICTR/MILITARY I - ANALYSIS: &#x2018;MILITARY I' VERDICT IS A FUNDAMENTAL JUDGEMENT AT ICTR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/20911-en-en-191208-ictrmilitary-i-analysis-military-i-verdict-is-a-fundamental-judgement-at-ictr1171811718.html/embed#?secret=xtWb1dYzRn" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;19.12.08 - ICTR/MILITARY I - ANALYSIS: &#x2018;MILITARY I' VERDICT IS A FUNDAMENTAL JUDGEMENT AT ICTR&#x201D; &#x2014; JusticeInfo.net" data-secret="xtWb1dYzRn" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Arusha, 19 December 2008 (FH) - The judgment of Theoneste Bagosora and his three co-defendants, former officials of the Rwandan army in 1994, should become one of the bases of the legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda as for its impact as well as its measure.</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/wp-content/uploads/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>630</thumbnail_height></oembed>
