<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>JusticeInfo.net</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/en</provider_url><title>09.01.12 - ICTR/ APPEALS/CURRENT CASES - ICTR LIKELY TO FOCUS ON APPEALS IN 2012 (Analysis)</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="kodJbGRyLS"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/24120-090112-ictr-appealscurrent-cases-ictr-likely-to-focus-on-appeals-in-2012-analysis.html"&gt;09.01.12 - ICTR/ APPEALS/CURRENT CASES - ICTR LIKELY TO FOCUS ON APPEALS IN 2012 (Analysis)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/24120-090112-ictr-appealscurrent-cases-ictr-likely-to-focus-on-appeals-in-2012-analysis.html/embed#?secret=kodJbGRyLS" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;09.01.12 - ICTR/ APPEALS/CURRENT CASES - ICTR LIKELY TO FOCUS ON APPEALS IN 2012 (Analysis)&#x201D; &#x2014; JusticeInfo.net" data-secret="kodJbGRyLS" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Arusha, January 9, 2012 (FH) - Having wrapped up most of its cases at trial stage, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is likely to focus on appeals in 2012. Its Appeals Chamber still has nine cases outstanding involving 19 individuals. According to UN Security Council Resolution 1966 of December 2010, the ICTR must [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.justiceinfo.net/wp-content/uploads/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>630</thumbnail_height></oembed>
