{"id":111007,"date":"2023-01-10T11:53:55","date_gmt":"2023-01-10T10:53:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/?p=111007"},"modified":"2023-01-10T12:08:35","modified_gmt":"2023-01-10T11:08:35","slug":"colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html","title":{"rendered":"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term <em>bersiap<\/em> in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar Marjolein van Pagee, despite last Thursday January 5 decision of the Amsterdam\u2019s Court of Appeal that \u201cthe term <em>bersiap<\/em> does not automatically contain negative conclusions about Indonesians\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>On October 13<sup>th<\/sup>, 2022, an Indonesian man, wearing a golden suit with a black velvet <em>peci <\/em>(Indonesian traditional cap), stood in front of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Before him, a black leather case with a sticker that read: \u2018Black Pete is racist.\u2019 [referring to the black companion of Saint Nicholas in Dutch folklore] He looked the judges straight in the eye when he spoke: \u2018I am delighted to stand here in front of indigenous, white native counselors.\u2019 It is unknown whether they were indeed indigenous to the Dutch land, but that was not the point. By reversing the use of the word <em>inlanders <\/em>(natives) to address representatives of the Dutch legal system, after all a white institution of power, he reminded them of the condescending way that Indonesians were treated during colonial times. For Indonesians, the word \u2018inlander\u2019 is a slur, perhaps similar to what the n-word means to people of African descent. He continued to explain that within the 350 years of Dutch colonial rule, Indonesians were never given the legal rights that he now got.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The man is named Jeffry Pondaag and he is the founder and chair of the <em>Komite Utang Kehormatan Belanda <\/em>(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kukb.nl\/\">KUKB<\/a>, Committee of Dutch Honorary Debts). It was not the first time that he made use of the rights that his ancestors did not have. His organization is known for the successful court cases against the Dutch state regarding the 1947 massacre in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.prakkendoliveira.nl\/images\/nieuws\/2011\/111205_-_press_release_rawagede.pdf\">West Javanese village of Rawagede<\/a>. After they won the first series of lawsuits in 2011, they continuously brought more cases to the Dutch court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For years, <a href=\"https:\/\/historibersama.com\/the-indonesia-interviews-jeffry-pondaag-part-ii\/\">Pondaag<\/a> fought for the rights of his fellow Indonesians who were brutally murdered, tortured or raped by the Dutch (colonial) army during the country\u2019s independence war that lasted from 1945 until 1949. His efforts did not go unnoticed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The gruesome facts that the cases brought to light also alarmed historians and journalists who wondered whether this was just \u2018the tip of the iceberg\u2019. Clearly, the KUKB court cases opened a Pandora box and put the sensitive topic of Dutch war crimes against Indonesians back on the agenda. However, instead of being acknowledged for his crucial role, Pondaag is often ignored and sidelined from discussions in the Netherlands, as he is considered too radical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What bersiap stands for<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In the court case of October, however, the accused was not the Dutch state, but the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam. In January 2022 KUKB had reported the Rijksmuseum, the curator Harm Stevens and director Taco Dibbits to the police. Their crime? The persistent use of the term \u2018bersiap\u2019 in the exhibition <em>Revolusi Indonesia Independent<\/em> (February 11 \u2013 June 5, 2022), which focused on the Indonesian independence war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not just Rijksmuseum but Dutch historians in general use the word \u2018bersiap\u2019 to indicate an outburst of anti-colonial violence that took place during the early phase of the revolution in 1945-46. In the Dutch context \u2018bersiap\u2019 stands for brutalities that were committed by Indonesians against Dutch, mixed-race Indo-Dutch and those who collaborated with the Dutch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, according to KUKB, the whole concept of bersiap is a Dutch colonial invention that only exists within Dutch history books. They maintain that the bersiap as historical period&nbsp; \u2013 often described as an isolated event in time of unilateral anticolonial violence from Indonesians against the Dutch \u2013 does not exist. During the same months that the Dutch claim that there was bersiap, Dutch and Allied forces committed acts of violence as well. The term also feeds the denial of the colonizers who do not want to see themselves as aggressors, occupiers of other people\u2019s land. Instead, the Dutch interpretation of bersiap creates the impression of a regular conflict where two rival nations are equally guilty of the violent escalation. Bersiap thus stands for the colonial frame of \u2018both sides.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Exposing anti-colonial violence in the Dutch context also ties in with racist orientalist ideas of Indonesians being generally kind and submissive but nevertheless capable of sudden and (at least for the colonizers) unexpected brutalities. Take for example the 1989 publication of Dutch historian Lou de Jong in which he explained the bersiap through the \u201cnature of the Javanese\u201d, whom he described as being known for their \u201csmoldering aggressiveness\u201d that could pop up unexpectedly. More recently the headline of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nrc.nl\/nieuws\/2017\/09\/12\/ik-moet-de-op-bloed-beluste-indonesische-strijder-begrijpen-12965684-a1573174\">an op-ed piece in Dutch daily NRC<\/a> read: \u201cI need to understand the blood-thirsty Indonesian fighter.\u201d As if bloodthirstiness and not the re-occupation was the motivation for Indonesians to take up arms against the Dutch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At first, the Dutch Public Prosecutor (OM) rejected KUKB\u2019s police report, based on the argument that the bersiap could be explained in different ways and that the term was not inherently offensive to Indonesians in general. They deemed it a non-legal issue that had to be solved through open debate within society. KUKB then submitted a complaint. Via a special legal procedure, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal was forced to examine the case and set up court hearings to listen to all parties involved. KUKB maintained that the Rijksmuseum had insulted Indonesians as a group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Lack of Indonesian representation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>At the court hearing, Pondaag was accompanied by another Indonesian, Dida Pattipilohy, then secretary of the foundation. The appearance of two Indonesians in front of a Dutch court is quite exceptional. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/88511-dutch-colonial-violence-missing-voices-indonesians.html\">Indonesians are hardly represented in the Netherlands<\/a> where they form a very small minority. Instead, those who identity as <em>Indische Nederlanders<\/em> (Dutch-Indies people) are dominantly present. They are of mixed Indo-European descent whose ancestors, during colonial times, were legally assimilated to Europeans. Their special legal status, which equaled Dutch citizenship, is the reason that they left Indonesia after the country became independent in 1945.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"667\" height=\"445\" src=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Indonesia_court-amsterdam.jpg\" alt=\"Jeffry Pondaag and Dida Pattipilohy pose in front of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal in the Netherlands. They are wearing the same black t-shirt that says &quot;Belanda Perampok&quot;.\" class=\"wp-image-111000\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Indonesia_court-amsterdam.jpg 667w, https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Indonesia_court-amsterdam-540x360.jpg 540w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 667px) 100vw, 667px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Jeffry Pondaag, chairman of the Komite Utang Kehormatan Belanda (KUKB) and Dida Pattipilohy, then secretary of the KUKB, in October 2022 after the hearing of their case against the Rijksmuseum by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal \u00a9 Marjolein van Pagee.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Another big minority group present in Dutch society are people who identify as Moluccan. They originate from the East Indonesian province of Maluku. During colonial times, their fathers or grandfathers collaborated with the Dutch by joining the colonial army. They in fact helped to commit the crimes that KUKB brought to court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As a result of the dominance of pro-colonial groups, the voices of the formerly oppressed, such as the Indonesian relatives represented by KUKB, are often not taken into account in public debates in the Netherlands. The attitude of the Rijksmuseum and the handling of this case illustrated this clearly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An important point is that curator Stevens, and also director Dibbits, were informed about the problems with the Dutch concept of bersiap beforehand. In June 2021, after Pondaag had criticized another Rijksmuseum exhibition, Stevens invited him, Pattipilohy and her 96-year-old mother for a talk. During this meeting the plans for the upcoming exhibition \u2018Revolusi\u2019 were extensively discussed. Again and again they emphasized that the idea of the bersiap as a separate period did not exist for Indonesians, as 350 years of Dutch colonialism had preceded 1945, which were followed by a bloody re-occupation war that lasted until 1949.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In fact, KUKB only went to the police <em>after<\/em> an op-ed piece by an Indonesian guest curator caused a stir. In January 11, 2022, one month before the opening of the exhibition, Bonnie Triyana published an opinion piece in Dutch daily NRC in which he announced that the Rijksmuseum would not use the term \u2018bersiap\u2019 anymore because of its racist connotation. It did not seem that Triyana was just sharing his personal opinion, because the next day, during the online press conference when curator Harm Stevens was asked <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/UCvwG2dBPAs\">why he had chosen to avoid the term bersiap<\/a> in the exhibition, he did not deny that this was the case. He only assured that they were nevertheless paying attention to the topic of anticolonial violence as such.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The point is that the museum officials did receive <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thejakartapost.com\/paper\/2022\/01\/19\/bersiap-ignoring-dutch-colonialism.html\">Triyana\u2019s piece up front<\/a> and did not distance themselves from him, <em>until<\/em> the situation got out of hand and they received angry messages from right-wing people, accusing them of following \u2018the woke-agenda.\u2019As opposed to Pondaag, Triyana (who lives in Indonesia) is not at all seen as radical. He does not seem the type to have deliberately caused this controversy. He was perhaps as shocked by the responses in Dutch society as the museum staff itself. But it was Triyana who was \u2018thrown under the bus\u2019 by the museum officials as if he had done something wrong. After the <em>Federatie of Indische Nederlanders<\/em> (FIN, Federation of Dutch-Indies people) reported him to the Dutch police, the Rijksmuseum publicly distanced itself from Triyana\u2019s statement. Director Dibbits, perhaps afraid of bad publicity, said that it was just Triyana\u2019s personal opinion. He went on to deny that the term was racist and promised they would continue to use it. He also explicitly stated that the Rijksmuseum was \u201cnot woke.\u201d All this led to KUKB\u2019s decision to report Rijksmuseum to the police.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Taking sides<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This is where the pain is: Dibbits immediately listened to Dutch-Indies people with openly colonial ideas, but dismissed Indonesians who addressed racism. The latter is a continuation of colonial racist hierarchies where Dutch-Indies people were closer to the colonizers than Indonesians, who were considered \u2018inlanders\u2019, natives, people you did not have to reckon with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Last week\u2019s rejection of the \u2018bersiap-case\u2019 shows that this goes much further than Dutch-Indies people and prevailing colonial ideas. This is about a white system of power not willing to face the facts: the Amsterdam Court of Appeal, the Rijksmuseum, the Dutch Public Prosecutor, they are closing ranks, not used to empowered Indonesians who stand up and use the law in their advantage. The short text of the verdict by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal only echoes the simplistic arguments that the Prosecutor had used in defense of the Rijksmuseum. No single word about the sensible arguments that KUKB had put forward during the hearing. <a href=\"https:\/\/kukb.nl\/press-release-court-amsterdam-ignores-arguments-of-k-u-k-b-in-bersiap-caseagainst-rijksmuseum\/\">Pondaag responded<\/a>: \u201cthe Dutch praise themselves for having a democratic constitutional state, but what I see is that white natives protect each other and ignore what Indonesians say.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"content-encadre\">\n<p><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-110982 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Marjolein-van-Pagee_@Mark-Kamphuis.jpg\" alt=\"Marjolein van Pagee\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Marjolein-van-Pagee_@Mark-Kamphuis.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Marjolein-van-Pagee_@Mark-Kamphuis-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/>MARJOLEIN VAN PAGEE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Marjolein van Pagee is an independent historian based in the Netherlands, specialized in the history of the Dutch occupation of Indonesia. She is the author of \u201cBanda. De Genocide van Jan Pieterszoon Coen\u201d (Banda. The Genocide of Jan Pieterszoon Coen, 2021). Van Pagee is the founder of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.historibersama.com\/\">Histori Bersama<\/a> Foundation, an online platform that provides Dutch-English-Indonesian translations of articles on Dutch colonialism in Indonesia. Since 2012 she actively supports the work of the KUKB foundation. Before the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, she both testified as an expert witness and defended the KUKB.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"articleLink articleLink--editorRecommanded articleLink--textInImage articleLink--textTop\" style=\"\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t<div class=\"articleLinkSurTitle\">Recommended reading<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t<a class=\"articleLinkImageLink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/87836-indonesia-dutch-colonisation-in-rosy-terms.html\"><div class=\"articleLinkImageContainer \"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"540\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Indonesia-Netherlands_prisoners-colonization_@AFP-540x360.jpg\" class=\"articleLinkImage backgroundImageTag w-100 wp-post-image\" alt=\"Indonesian prisoners (hands on head) are escorted by Dutch soldiers\" srcset=\"\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/div><\/a>\r\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/87836-indonesia-dutch-colonisation-in-rosy-terms.html\" class=\"articleLinkTitle articleLinkTitle--default\">\r\n\t\t\tIndonesia: the Dutch no longer can see colonisation in rosy terms\r\n\t\t<\/a>\r\n\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term bersiap in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":110995,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[545,566,567],"tags":[2894,3006,3005],"ji_location":[2275,2373],"class_list":["post-111007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-memory","category-national-tribunals","category-opinion","tag-colonialism","tag-racism","tag-racisme-en","ji_location-indonesia","ji_location-netherlands"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.3.1 (Yoast SEO v25.3.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum - JusticeInfo.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term bersiap in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar Marjolein van Pagee, despite last Thursday January 5 decision of the Amsterdam\u2019s Court of Appeal that \u201cthe term bersiap does not automatically contain negative conclusions about Indonesians\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term bersiap in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar Marjolein van Pagee, despite last Thursday January 5 decision of the Amsterdam\u2019s Court of Appeal that \u201cthe term bersiap does not automatically contain negative conclusions about Indonesians\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"JusticeInfo.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-10T10:53:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-10T11:08:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marjolein van Pagee\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Marjolein van Pagee\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"solivri\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865\"},\"headline\":\"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-10T10:53:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-10T11:08:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html\"},\"wordCount\":1853,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"colonialism\",\"racism\",\"racisme\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Memory\",\"National tribunals\",\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html\",\"name\":\"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum - JusticeInfo.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-10T10:53:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-10T11:08:35+00:00\",\"description\":\"The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term bersiap in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar Marjolein van Pagee, despite last Thursday January 5 decision of the Amsterdam\u2019s Court of Appeal that \u201cthe term bersiap does not automatically contain negative conclusions about Indonesians\u201d.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":800,\"caption\":\"A visitor walks through the collections of the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, plunged into a virulent controversy for having used the term \\\"bersiap\\\", which echoes the memory of the colonial violence perpetrated in Indonesia by the Kingdom of the Netherlands. \u00a9 Olaf Kraak \/ ANP \/ AFP\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/\",\"name\":\"JusticeInfo.net\",\"description\":\"For justice to be done, it must be seen\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Justice Info\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"width\":1199,\"height\":1200,\"caption\":\"Justice Info\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"Marjolein van Pagee\",\"url\":\"\/en\/?s=Marjolein van Pagee\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum - JusticeInfo.net","description":"The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term bersiap in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar Marjolein van Pagee, despite last Thursday January 5 decision of the Amsterdam\u2019s Court of Appeal that \u201cthe term bersiap does not automatically contain negative conclusions about Indonesians\u201d.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum","og_description":"The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term bersiap in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar Marjolein van Pagee, despite last Thursday January 5 decision of the Amsterdam\u2019s Court of Appeal that \u201cthe term bersiap does not automatically contain negative conclusions about Indonesians\u201d.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html","og_site_name":"JusticeInfo.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","article_published_time":"2023-01-10T10:53:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-10T11:08:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marjolein van Pagee","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_site":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Marjolein van Pagee","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html"},"author":{"name":"solivri","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865"},"headline":"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum","datePublished":"2023-01-10T10:53:55+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-10T11:08:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html"},"wordCount":1853,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg","keywords":["colonialism","racism","racisme"],"articleSection":["Memory","National tribunals","Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html","name":"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum - JusticeInfo.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-10T10:53:55+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-10T11:08:35+00:00","description":"The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam was sued by Indonesians for using the racist term bersiap in a recent exhibition. It is through court cases that Indonesian rights activists have changed the debate over the Dutch colonial past and exposed colonial crimes. And it is in court again that lasting colonial ideas are being fought, tells scholar Marjolein van Pagee, despite last Thursday January 5 decision of the Amsterdam\u2019s Court of Appeal that \u201cthe term bersiap does not automatically contain negative conclusions about Indonesians\u201d.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Netherlands_Amsterdam-Rijksmuseum_@Olaf-Kraak-ANP-AFP.jpg","width":1200,"height":800,"caption":"A visitor walks through the collections of the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, plunged into a virulent controversy for having used the term \"bersiap\", which echoes the memory of the colonial violence perpetrated in Indonesia by the Kingdom of the Netherlands. \u00a9 Olaf Kraak \/ ANP \/ AFP"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/111007-colonial-racism-catches-up-with-amsterdam-rijksmuseum.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Colonial racism catches up with Amsterdam Rijksmuseum"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/","name":"JusticeInfo.net","description":"For justice to be done, it must be seen","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization","name":"Justice Info","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","width":1199,"height":1200,"caption":"Justice Info"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA"]},{"@type":"Person","name":"Marjolein van Pagee","url":"\/en\/?s=Marjolein van Pagee"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111007"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":111019,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111007\/revisions\/111019"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/110995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111007"},{"taxonomy":"ji_location","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ji_location?post=111007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}