{"id":123512,"date":"2023-10-20T12:32:27","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T10:32:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/?p=123512"},"modified":"2024-02-05T16:34:31","modified_gmt":"2024-02-05T15:34:31","slug":"the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html","title":{"rendered":"The law and the spectacle of the law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

On 10 October, Canada and the Netherlands appeared before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, applying for \u2018provisional measures\u2019 to prevent ongoing, systematic, entrenched torture practices being committed by the Syrian government. The hearing was clinical, heavy with legalese. It was not attended by any representatives of Syria. Yet it seems to bring optimism among lawyers and victims\u2019 associations. Scholar Lucy Gaynor unravels the odd nature and paradoxes of these proceedings.<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe trust in international law.\u201d These were the words of Alan Kessel, representative of the Canadian government before the International Court of Justice (ICJ)<\/a>, during a post-hearing press conference on the steps of the \u2018Peace Palace\u2019 on 10 October. Standing mere feet away from Kessel, outside the grandiose building, surrounded by carefully manicured lawns and flowerbeds, I struggled to hear him. Outside the gates, chants of \u2018Hurriyah, Hurriyah,<\/em> Hurriyah<\/em>\u2019 (Freedom, Freedom, Freedom), rose loudly as Syrian flags waved. Kessel\u2019s pledge of allegiance to \u2018international law\u2019 was a response to a specific question from a reporter: \u201cThe Syrians didn\u2019t even turn up today, what makes you think they would adhere to any measures demanded by the court?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This question is the subtext of this entire legal dispute. It is a key tension underlying this attempt to hold the Syrian government accountable for torture<\/a> under international law. Survivor and activist groups outside the Peace Palace seemed both wholeheartedly realistic about what the court can \u2018achieve\u2019 (i.e., next to nothing), and yet incredibly positive about the case. Grappling with this paradox involves reflecting on the aspirations, inspirations, and imaginations ascribed to international legal proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is the importance of a legally dense, technical procedure? Particularly one in which one of the parties (Syria) refuses to show up? What can such a dispute, in such a specific arena, provide?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

International crime-fighting tool, or Temple of technicalities?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The International Court of Justice is an instrument for adjudicating disputes between states. Historically, this has entailed judging land or sea border disputes, questions of territorial sovereignty, and disagreements over the legality of the use of force. Despite consistent mix-ups in the press, the ICJ is not the International Criminal Court (ICC)<\/a>. The ICC styles itself as a tool to end impunity through internationalised, individualised, criminal justice. It sits in a glass-fronted stronghold whose interior would make an Ikea showroom-designer envious. The ICJ \u2013 three kilometres away \u2013 sits in a palatial building with a cathedral-esque interior replete with stained glass windows, domed ceilings, and Latin inscriptions beneath relief carvings of \u2018veritas\u2019 (truth) and \u2018justitia\u2019 (justice). If the ICC is a secular shrine to individual criminal responsibility, justice for victims, and reckoning with atrocity crimes, the ICJ is a temple of genteel treaty disputes, legal technicalities, and obscure Latin phrases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, however, innovative legal practitioners have begun to use the court as an arena to reckon with atrocity crimes which do not directly impact the states bringing the issue to court, such as genocide (in the case of The Gambia v. Myanmar<\/a>) and torture (Canada and the Netherlands v. Syria). Canada and the Netherlands are addressing the issue of torture in Syria<\/a> in terms of a treaty dispute. All three countries are party to the \u2018Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment\u2019 (CAT). Article 2 of the Convention states that \u201ceach state party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures\u201d to prevent torture on any territory under its jurisdiction. The legal principle of erga omnes partes<\/em> (one such obscure Latin phrase, literally translated as \u2018towards all parties\u2019), allows any country that is party to a convention such as the CAT to bring a legal case for violations which may not directly affect them. The argument in such cases is that parties to a treaty or convention have obligations to all other parties, and if they do not fulfil those obligations there exists grounds for a legitimate legal dispute. It was under the principle of erga omnes partes<\/em> that The Gambia \u2013 a tiny country in West Africa with a population of approximately 2.5 million \u2013 could bring a case against Myanmar, the largest country in Southeast Asia with a population of 55 million, for alleged violations of the Genocide Convention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this instance, Canada and the Netherlands have asked the court to rule on 7 overarching \u2018provisional measures\u2019, designed to put an end to ongoing torture and related human rights violations carried out by the Syrian government against the Syrian people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Syria
Conspicuously empty seats of the Syrian Arab Republic\u2019s delegation during the hearings on 10 October 2023. \u00a9 CIJ-ICJ<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Optimism in verbal paraphernalia<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The prospect of the International Court of Justice as an arena for reckoning with atrocity crimes has been welcomed with optimism by many. The discourse around the Syria hearings provides proof of this. Human Rights Watch<\/a> referred to it as a \u201cwatershed\u201d moment, and \u201can opportunity to scrutinise Syria\u2019s long-standing heinous torture of countless civilians\u201d. The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs<\/a> called it a \u201ccrucial step towards achieving truth, justice, and accountability\u201d. These exact words were echoed by Canadian Foreign Policy outlets<\/a>. Academics applauded the fact that the case was going ahead, claiming it as proof that the ICJ can be a \u201cnew tool for enforcing human rights\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This optimistic, action-based language stands in stark contrast to the procedural minutiae of the court itself. When the 15 ICJ judges entered the courtroom and sat down, President Joan E. O\u2019Donoghue (USA) reeled off a procedural history of the submissions of the parties. There was no reflection on the significance of the case, no tributes to \u2018justice\u2019, \u2018truth\u2019, or \u2018ending impunity\u2019, no acknowledgement of the packed public gallery or the (presumably) significant online audience. The judges\u2019 demeanour seemed to indicate that this was a technical legal procedure \u2013 almost surgical in its precision \u2013 and would be conducted as such.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With an absence of verbal fanfare that contrasted starkly with the opulence of the setting, the Netherlands and Canada began their submissions. Representative of the Netherlands Ren\u00e9 Lefeber announced that his team had \u201celected not to show you images of victims of torture\u201d as this could \u201cunnecessarily sensationalise\u201d their request for provisional measures. Other than a few rhetorical flourishes, the case presented to the judges\u2019 bench and the empty chairs of the Syrian representatives was clinical, and heavy with legalese. Sitting in this austere courtroom, I struggled myself to wade through the verbal paraphernalia of jurisdictional and rights-based questions at hand. Looking at the conspicuously empty seats of the Syrian delegation and considering the ICJ\u2019s lack of power to enforce the provisional measures it may hand down raised the question of how optimistic, activistic, nonlegal aspirations could coexist with the court\u2019s self-imposed sanitised, purely legal discussions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s the meaning of it?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Sitting in the packed \u2018Van Gogh\u2019 conference room at the Marriott Hotel on Wednesday 11 October, I listened to a roundtable organised by Syrian survivor-led organisations. All speakers acknowledged the near certainty that the provisional measures would not be enacted and could not be enforced. The focus was on these proceedings as a \u201cfirst step\u201d. For some, it was a first step towards eliminating the false narratives of the Syrian regime. For others, it was about shifting the balance of power from the regime to the people. Most intriguingly was the view of these proceedings as a \u201cfirst step\u201d on the road to the ICC, which would be \u201cthe dream for many Syrians\u201d. The ICC, currently, has no jurisdiction over violence in Syria, as Syria is not a party to the Rome Statute. The individual focus of the ICC means that even with jurisdiction, it was deemed as a route to \u2018justice\u2019 that is both desirable and problematic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Protesters outside the Peace Palace stood with a banner that called for the trial of the \u201cchemical criminal\u201d Assad. At the same time, torture survivor Ahmad Helmi claimed that Assad\u2019s imprisonment would not be enough. The issue for him was that \u201ctorture in Syria is a curriculum, is a system\u201d, and therefore \u201cthe state has to be held accountable\u201d. Assad is the face of state violence in Syria, and to a large degree without his accountability many will not perceive \u2018justice\u2019. The systematised nature of the violence in Syria means, however, that it would be impossible to truly account for criminality through the lens of judging just one individual, no matter how powerful. This, then, is where the ICJ\u2019s atrocity crime paradox peaks. The International Court of Justice as a tool for addressing atrocity crimes is an enigma: both powerful and inadequate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If there is a possibility for the ICJ to address \u2013 in narrative if not legal terms \u2013 the structural violence for which the ICC is so ill-equipped by virtue of its focus on individual actions rather than systems, there needs to be a reckoning with the limits of its abilities. Perhaps both Alan Kessel and Syrian survivors \u201ctrust in international law\u201d in this case. But if Kessel trusts that the law (and specifically the ICJ\u2019s enactment of the law) can hand down an abstract \u2018justice\u2019 to Syrians, the survivor and activist community have a more nuanced view. This community appears to trust that not the law, but the spectacle of the law, will elevate their narrative, invite discourse, and bestow legitimacy. Ultimately the ICJ may become, in atrocity crimes cases, an engine of meaning-making rather than of legal responsibility. The real battle then will not be over jurisdiction, but over who grants legitimacy to the narratives of the court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe as survivors are also evidence\u201d<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In the case of Canada and the Netherlands vs. Syria, the Syrian government has tried to deny legitimacy to the court\u2019s meaning-making by refusing to attend the hearings. The International Court of Justice as an institution asserts legitimacy of meaning through its long history, grand setting, and legal prowess. Legal representatives for Canada and the Netherlands try to create meaning through the perceived inherent legitimacy of their cause, and their ability to weave intricate legal arguments using precedent, statutes, and technical legal language. It remains to be seen how this meaning-making and battle for legitimacy will play out in later hearings. But for the Syrian diaspora and survivor communities outside the Peace Palace gates, the spectacle of the hearings gave them a kind of embodied legitimacy. They saw the court not as an end in itself but as a means, \u201canother tool that we can use\u201d. They are sceptical of the court\u2019s power, yet optimistic that its narratives can set them, as a community, on the \u201cpath of justice\u201d. As one survivor remarked: \u201cWe are also a memory. We as survivors are also evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n

\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t
Recommended reading<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t
\"Chines<\/div><\/a>\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\tICJ admits genocide case against Myanmar\r\n\t\t<\/a>\r\n\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n
\r\n\t

\"LucyLUCY J. GAYNOR<\/strong><\/p>\n

PhD Researcher at University of Amsterdam and NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust, and Genocide Studies, examining the construction of historical narratives within international criminal trials.<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On 10 October, Canada and the Netherlands appeared before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, applying for \u2018provisional measures\u2019 to prevent ongoing, systematic, entrenched torture practices being committed by the Syrian government. The hearing was clinical, heavy with legalese. It was not attended by any representatives of Syria. Yet it seems to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":123498,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4138,4140,567],"tags":[2640],"ji_location":[2159,2373,2499],"class_list":["post-123512","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-internationale-de-justice-cij","category-international-court-of-justice-icj","category-opinion","tag-torture-en","ji_location-canada","ji_location-netherlands","ji_location-syria"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nSyria: the clinical "spectacle" of the International Court of Justice<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Despite the coldness and technicality of the ICJ, survivors and activists remain optimistic when Canada and the Netherlands apply to the Court about acts of torture in Syria, systematically perpetrated by the government.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The law and the spectacle of the law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Despite the coldness and technicality of the ICJ, survivors and activists remain optimistic when Canada and the Netherlands apply to the Court about acts of torture in Syria, systematically perpetrated by the government.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"JusticeInfo.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-20T10:32:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-05T15:34:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"solivri\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"solivri\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"solivri\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865\"},\"headline\":\"The law and the spectacle of the law\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-20T10:32:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-05T15:34:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html\"},\"wordCount\":1782,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"torture\"],\"articleSection\":[\"CIJ\",\"International Court of Justice\",\"Opinion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html\",\"name\":\"Syria: the clinical \\\"spectacle\\\" of the International Court of Justice\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-20T10:32:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-05T15:34:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"Despite the coldness and technicality of the ICJ, survivors and activists remain optimistic when Canada and the Netherlands apply to the Court about acts of torture in Syria, systematically perpetrated by the government.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":900,\"caption\":\"Crowds gathered outside the Peace Palace early on the morning of the hearing on 10 October 2023. A protester carrying a Syrian flag looks over photos of the detained, disappeared, and tortured. The photos are accompanied by signs reading \u201cWhere are they?\u201d, and \u201cICJ: Hold Assad Accountable!\u201d. \u00a9 Lucy Gaynor\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The law and the spectacle of the law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/\",\"name\":\"JusticeInfo.net\",\"description\":\"For justice to be done, it must be seen\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Justice Info\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"width\":1199,\"height\":1200,\"caption\":\"Justice Info\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"solivri\",\"url\":\"\/en\/?s=solivri\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Syria: the clinical \"spectacle\" of the International Court of Justice","description":"Despite the coldness and technicality of the ICJ, survivors and activists remain optimistic when Canada and the Netherlands apply to the Court about acts of torture in Syria, systematically perpetrated by the government.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The law and the spectacle of the law","og_description":"Despite the coldness and technicality of the ICJ, survivors and activists remain optimistic when Canada and the Netherlands apply to the Court about acts of torture in Syria, systematically perpetrated by the government.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html","og_site_name":"JusticeInfo.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-20T10:32:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-05T15:34:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":900,"url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"solivri","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_site":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"solivri","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html"},"author":{"name":"solivri","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865"},"headline":"The law and the spectacle of the law","datePublished":"2023-10-20T10:32:27+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-05T15:34:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html"},"wordCount":1782,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg","keywords":["torture"],"articleSection":["CIJ","International Court of Justice","Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html","name":"Syria: the clinical \"spectacle\" of the International Court of Justice","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg","datePublished":"2023-10-20T10:32:27+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-05T15:34:31+00:00","description":"Despite the coldness and technicality of the ICJ, survivors and activists remain optimistic when Canada and the Netherlands apply to the Court about acts of torture in Syria, systematically perpetrated by the government.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Syria_Netherlands-international-court-of-justice-ICJ-peace-palace-The-Hague_@Lucy-Gaynor.jpg","width":1200,"height":900,"caption":"Crowds gathered outside the Peace Palace early on the morning of the hearing on 10 October 2023. A protester carrying a Syrian flag looks over photos of the detained, disappeared, and tortured. The photos are accompanied by signs reading \u201cWhere are they?\u201d, and \u201cICJ: Hold Assad Accountable!\u201d. \u00a9 Lucy Gaynor"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/123512-the-law-and-the-spectacle-of-the-law.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The law and the spectacle of the law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/","name":"JusticeInfo.net","description":"For justice to be done, it must be seen","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization","name":"Justice Info","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","width":1199,"height":1200,"caption":"Justice Info"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA"]},{"@type":"Person","name":"solivri","url":"\/en\/?s=solivri"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123512"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123512\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":128144,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123512\/revisions\/128144"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/123498"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123512"},{"taxonomy":"ji_location","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ji_location?post=123512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}