{"id":24441,"date":"2012-05-28T13:09:56","date_gmt":"2012-05-28T11:09:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html"},"modified":"2012-05-28T13:09:56","modified_gmt":"2012-05-28T11:09:56","slug":"280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html","title":{"rendered":"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Arusha, May 28, 2012 (FH) \u2013 The defence for former Rwandan Planning Minister Augustin Ngirabatware has challenged the decisions by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), denying the accused to call extra witnesses, but at the same time allowing prosecution to reopen its case.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In its first instance decisions of May 18, 2012, the Tribunal allowed the prosecution to call one more witness to rebut Ngirabatware\u2019s defence of alibi over his absence in Rwanda at some point during genocide, but denied him to call five witnesses in attempt to rejoin the rebuttal evidence.<\/p>\n<p>The defence, in its two separate motions filed on May 25, 2012, seeks certification to appeal the decisions, delay the testimony of the prosecution witness and stay of presentation of closing arguments scheduled for June 18 and 19, 2012, pending determination of the applications.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe decision to grant the reopening of the rebuttal leads to an unjustified advantage for the prosecution and leads to unfairness and prejudice to the accused,\u201d one motion reads in part.<\/p>\n<p>It adds, \u201cUnder these prejudicial circumstances, the accused will be confronted to an unfair advantage given to prosecution while his request for rejoinder was dismissed. This differential treatment runs against the principle of equality of arms and is against the interest of justice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In another motion, the defence submitted that the decision denying Ngirabatware to call the five witnesses was wrong in law and facts and \u201cconstitutes an abuse of power or discretion on part of the Trial Chamber that resulted in an injustice for the accused.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In January 2011, Ngirabatware requested the Trial Chamber presided by Judge William Sekule to disqualify itself from the case on the grounds that it was biased. His motion was ruled out against him.<\/p>\n<p>Ngirabatware is charged with conspiracy to commit genocide, genocide or in the alternative, complicity in genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide and extermination and rape as crimes against humanity.<\/p>\n<p>FK\/NI<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arusha, May 28, 2012 (FH) \u2013 The defence for former Rwandan Planning Minister Augustin Ngirabatware has challenged the decisions by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), denying the accused to call extra witnesses, but at the same time allowing prosecution to reopen its case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[555],"tags":[],"ji_location":[],"class_list":["post-24441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hirondellenews"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.3.1 (Yoast SEO v25.3.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE - JusticeInfo.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arusha, May 28, 2012 (FH) \u2013 The defence for former Rwandan Planning Minister Augustin Ngirabatware has challenged the decisions by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), denying the accused to call extra witnesses, but at the same time allowing prosecution to reopen its case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"JusticeInfo.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-05-28T11:09:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"solivri\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"solivri\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"solivri\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865\"},\"headline\":\"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-05-28T11:09:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html\"},\"wordCount\":324,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hirondelle News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html\",\"name\":\"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE - JusticeInfo.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-05-28T11:09:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/\",\"name\":\"JusticeInfo.net\",\"description\":\"For justice to be done, it must be seen\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Justice Info\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"width\":1199,\"height\":1200,\"caption\":\"Justice Info\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"solivri\",\"url\":\"\/en\/?s=solivri\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE - JusticeInfo.net","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE","og_description":"Arusha, May 28, 2012 (FH) \u2013 The defence for former Rwandan Planning Minister Augustin Ngirabatware has challenged the decisions by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), denying the accused to call extra witnesses, but at the same time allowing prosecution to reopen its case.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html","og_site_name":"JusticeInfo.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","article_published_time":"2012-05-28T11:09:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"solivri","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_site":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"solivri","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html"},"author":{"name":"solivri","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865"},"headline":"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE","datePublished":"2012-05-28T11:09:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html"},"wordCount":324,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hirondelle News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html","name":"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE - JusticeInfo.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-05-28T11:09:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/24441-280512-ictrngirabatware-defence-challenges-decisions-over-witnesses-in-ngirabatware-case.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"28.05.12 - ICTR\/NGIRABATWARE - DEFENCE CHALLENGES DECISIONS OVER WITNESSES IN NGIRABATWARE CASE"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/","name":"JusticeInfo.net","description":"For justice to be done, it must be seen","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#organization","name":"Justice Info","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","width":1199,"height":1200,"caption":"Justice Info"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA"]},{"@type":"Person","name":"solivri","url":"\/en\/?s=solivri"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24441"},{"taxonomy":"ji_location","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ji_location?post=24441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}