{"id":3241,"date":"2008-01-04T06:49:44","date_gmt":"2008-01-04T05:49:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html"},"modified":"2008-01-04T06:49:44","modified_gmt":"2008-01-04T05:49:44","slug":"030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html","title":{"rendered":"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA  - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p  >\nArusha, 3 janvier 2008 (FH) - Alors que les juridictions gacaca charg\u00e9es de juger la grande majorit\u00e9 des auteurs pr\u00e9sum\u00e9s du g\u00e9nocide de 1994 s\u2019appr\u00eatent \u00e0 boucler leurs travaux, le gouvernement et les survivants dressent un bilan controvers\u00e9 de ce syst\u00e8me judiciaire inspir\u00e9 de la tradition rwandaise.  <\/p>\n<p>A ce jour, environ un million de suspects, soit le dixi\u00e8me de la population rwandaise, se sont expliqu\u00e9s devant ces juridictions semi-traditionnelles et plus de 800.\n<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p  >\n000 d\u2019entre eux ont \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9s, selon le Service national des juridictions gacacas (SNJG), l\u2019organe gouvernemental charg\u00e9 de superviser et de coordonner l\u2019activit\u00e9 des ces tribunaux. <\/p>\n<p>Le gouvernement rwandais s\u2019\u00e9tait fix\u00e9 pour objectif de terminer les proc\u00e8s gacacas au 31 d\u00e9cembre. L\u2019essentiel du travail a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait, de nombreuses juridictions gacacas ont termin\u00e9 depuis longtemps, selon la Secr\u00e9taire ex\u00e9cutive du SNJG, Mme Domitille Mukantaganzwa. L\u00e0 o\u00f9 le besoin se fera sentir un d\u00e9lai suppl\u00e9mentaire sera accord\u00e9, a-t-elle annonc\u00e9. <\/p>\n<p>Le bilan chiffr\u00e9 force l\u2019admiration de tous les observateurs si l\u2019on sait que les juges gacacas sont b\u00e9n\u00e9voles et que c\u2019est seulement en juillet 2006 que les proc\u00e8s gacacas, d\u2019abord ouverts dans quelques juridictions pilotes, sont entr\u00e9s dans leur phase nationale de jugement. Mais, s\u2019agissant de la qualit\u00e9 des jugements rendus, l\u2019\u00e9valuation est loin d\u2019\u00eatre unanime. <\/p>\n<p>Au terme d\u2019un congr\u00e8s extraordinaire tenu au d\u00e9but du mois \u00e0 Kigali, Ibuka, la principale organisation de survivants du g\u00e9nocide,  a formul\u00e9 une kyrielle de critiques. Le collectif d\u00e9nonce \u00ab l\u2019intimidation de t\u00e9moins \u00e0 charge, l\u2019incarc\u00e9ration de survivants, la protection d\u2019intellectuels, de nantis ou de responsables accus\u00e9s, une grande ing\u00e9rence des responsables du Service national des juridictions gacacas dans le d\u00e9roulement des proc\u00e8s (\u2026) de nombreux cas de semblants de proc\u00e9dures judiciaires \u00bb, etc. <\/p>\n<p>Selon un participant \u00e0 ce congr\u00e8s, le d\u00e9bat a \u00e9t\u00e9 virulent et le communiqu\u00e9 final ne r\u00e9fl\u00e8te pas le ton g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Pourtant Ibuka y affirme que \u00ab les juridictions gacacas n\u2019ont apport\u00e9 qu\u2019une faible contribution \u00e0 la r\u00e9conciliation des Rwandais car il y a de profondes inimiti\u00e9s entre les t\u00e9moins \u00e0 charge et les accus\u00e9s, une certaine d\u00e9ception, un sentiment de d\u00e9sespoir chez les rescap\u00e9s du g\u00e9nocide qui estiment qu\u2019ils n\u2019ont pas eu droit \u00e0 la justice qu\u2019ils attendaient \u00bb. <\/p>\n<p>Il n\u2019en fallait pas plus pour faire sortir de son habituelle r\u00e9serve le ministre de la Justice, Tharcisse Karugarama. \u00abLe Service national des juridictions gacacas a enregistr\u00e9 des r\u00e9alisations importantes dont tous les Rwandais devraient se r\u00e9jouir \u00bb, a r\u00e9agi le ministre sur les ondes de Radio Rwanda. <\/p>\n<p>Pour lui, \u00ab ceux qui voient les choses autrement sont des personnes jamais satisfaites \u00bb. Il a exhort\u00e9 Ibuka \u00e0 \u00ab\u00e9viter d\u2019exag\u00e9rer \u00bb et \u00e0 ne pas faire de g\u00e9n\u00e9ralisation. Le responsable rwandais a rejet\u00e9 les all\u00e9gations d\u2019ing\u00e9rence des autorit\u00e9s dans l\u2019activit\u00e9 des tribunaux gacacas. \u00ab Cela n\u2019est pas vrai, ce n\u2019est m\u00eame pas possible \u00bb, a-t-il affirm\u00e9, appelant Ibuka \u00e0 ne pas dramatiser les choses. <\/p>\n<p>Dans la m\u00eame veine, la Secr\u00e9taire ex\u00e9cutive du SNJG a fait part de son \u00ab grand \u00e9tonnement \u00bb dans une conf\u00e9rence de presse dans ses bureaux le lendemain. Apr\u00e8s avoir rassur\u00e9 les survivants du g\u00e9nocide, Mme Mukantaganzwa a par ailleurs rejet\u00e9 d\u2019une des critiques les plus souvent formul\u00e9es par les organisations internationales des droits de l\u2019homme : le manque d\u2019assistance judiciaire devant ces juridictions qui peuvent prononcer jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la prison \u00e0 vie alors qu\u2019elles ne sont pas anim\u00e9es par des juges professionnels. <\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Les droits de la d\u00e9fense sont garantis par les juridictions gacacas dans la mesure o\u00f9 toute personne qui souhaite prendre la parole en faveur d\u2019un accus\u00e9 a le droit de le faire \u00bb, a rappel\u00e9 Mme Mukantaganzwa. \u00ab En r\u00e9alit\u00e9 devant les gacacas, l\u2019accus\u00e9 est d\u00e9fendu par plus d\u2019un avocat \u00bb, a \u2013t- elle estim\u00e9, invitant ses concitoyens \u00e0 ne pas nourrir de \u00ab complexe d\u2019inf\u00e9riorit\u00e9 \u00bb par rapport au mod\u00e8le occidental des droits de la d\u00e9fense. <\/p>\n<p> Mettant ses d\u00e9tracteurs au d\u00e9fi de lui proposer une meilleure recette, le discours officiel \u00e0 Kigali  a toujours expliqu\u00e9 que le syst\u00e8me gacaca est \u00ab une solution typiquement rwandaise \u00e0 une probl\u00e9matique rwandaise\u00bb. <\/p>\n<p>PB\/GF<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arusha, 3 janvier 2008 (FH) - Alors que les juridictions gacaca charg\u00e9es de juger la grande majorit\u00e9 des auteurs pr\u00e9sum\u00e9s du g\u00e9nocide de 1994 s\u2019appr\u00eatent \u00e0 boucler leurs travaux, le gouvernement et les survivants dressent un bilan controvers\u00e9 de ce syst\u00e8me judiciaire inspir\u00e9 de la tradition rwandaise. A ce jour, environ un million de suspects, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[554],"tags":[],"ji_location":[],"class_list":["post-3241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hirondellenews"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.3.1 (Yoast SEO v25.3.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA - JusticeInfo.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arusha, 3 janvier 2008 (FH) - Alors que les juridictions gacaca charg\u00e9es de juger la grande majorit\u00e9 des auteurs pr\u00e9sum\u00e9s du g\u00e9nocide de 1994 s\u2019appr\u00eatent \u00e0 boucler leurs travaux, le gouvernement et les survivants dressent un bilan controvers\u00e9 de ce syst\u00e8me judiciaire inspir\u00e9 de la tradition rwandaise. A ce jour, environ un million de suspects, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"JusticeInfo.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-01-04T05:49:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"solivri\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@justiceinfonet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"solivri\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"solivri\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865\"},\"headline\":\"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-04T05:49:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html\"},\"wordCount\":746,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hirondelle News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html\",\"name\":\"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA - JusticeInfo.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-04T05:49:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\",\"name\":\"JusticeInfo.net\",\"description\":\"La justice doit \u00eatre vue pour \u00eatre rendue\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#organization\",\"name\":\"Justice Info\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png\",\"width\":1199,\"height\":1200,\"caption\":\"Justice Info\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"solivri\",\"url\":\"\/fr\/?s=solivri\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA - JusticeInfo.net","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA","og_description":"Arusha, 3 janvier 2008 (FH) - Alors que les juridictions gacaca charg\u00e9es de juger la grande majorit\u00e9 des auteurs pr\u00e9sum\u00e9s du g\u00e9nocide de 1994 s\u2019appr\u00eatent \u00e0 boucler leurs travaux, le gouvernement et les survivants dressent un bilan controvers\u00e9 de ce syst\u00e8me judiciaire inspir\u00e9 de la tradition rwandaise. A ce jour, environ un million de suspects, [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html","og_site_name":"JusticeInfo.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","article_published_time":"2008-01-04T05:49:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/JusticeInfoNet_logo_1200x630px.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"solivri","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_site":"@justiceinfonet","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"solivri","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html"},"author":{"name":"solivri","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#\/schema\/person\/6e53cba1629e2e66f3fc1821d3091865"},"headline":"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA","datePublished":"2008-01-04T05:49:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html"},"wordCount":746,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#organization"},"articleSection":["Hirondelle News"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html","name":"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA - JusticeInfo.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#website"},"datePublished":"2008-01-04T05:49:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/3241-030108-rwandagacaca-bilan-controverse-des-tribunaux-gacaca31.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"03.01.08 - RWANDA\/GACACA - BILAN CONTROVERSE DES TRIBUNAUX GACACA"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#website","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr","name":"JusticeInfo.net","description":"La justice doit \u00eatre vue pour \u00eatre rendue","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#organization","name":"Justice Info","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/justiceinfo_logo-trans_1200x1200px.png","width":1199,"height":1200,"caption":"Justice Info"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JusticeInfo\/","https:\/\/x.com\/justiceinfonet","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/justice-info","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCyCEsARodyuWtkWyhn-e7pA"]},{"@type":"Person","name":"solivri","url":"\/fr\/?s=solivri"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3241\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3241"},{"taxonomy":"ji_location","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.justiceinfo.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ji_location?post=3241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}